The Bible Codec
By Ken Marlin
Chapter 1
Judaism's View of Jesus
“Why Jews don’t believe Jesus”
Because of the outrage from the Christians and Muslims, Jews removed sections of the Talmud and teach their anti-missionary sessions in secret.
The “Bible Codec” is a summary of what Jews teach in secret.
l. Christianity is; “A Mamzer Revolt Against Israel”.
The Seventh Jewish Commandment is “Thou shalt not commit adultery”.
Adultery is; “Having a relationship that is forbidden in the Tanakh (Jewish Bible)”.
Children from forbidden relationships are called “mamzers”.
A mamzer is “non-Jew”.
A. Jesus was a mamzer.
In Judaism every name tells a story;
Yeshua = Jeshua = Jesus.
The Hebrew demise of “Yeshua’s” (Jeshua/ Jesus) sons originates in Ezra 10:18 where the original Yeshua was the first high priest of the Second Temple whose sons had married alien wives, and God commanded Yeshua’s sons to; “send their alien wives and her children away”.
Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of “”Jeshua* (Yeshua/ Jesus)”” the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, “”Eliezer””, Jarib and Gedaliah. Tanakh
19 and they all gave their hand in a pledge that they would send their alien wives and her children away*.
In Judaism names follow lineages; Numbers 1:18, 36:7-9
Jesus was a descendant of Yeshua’s sons who had married foreign wives.
Jesus was a mamzer.
Deu 23:2,3 A mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of The Lord, even to the tenth generation (never), nor his offspring. Tanakh
Hence, Jesus “Bitterly Hated” the Sanhedrin of Sadducees, Pharisees and teachers of the Law.
* Compare to; “Hagar and Ishmael”.
1. Joseph was a mamzer;
In Judaism names follow lineages (Numbers 1:18, 36:7);
Luke 3:29 the son of Jeshua (Yeshua/ Jesus), the son of “Eliezer”...
Matt 1:15 “Eliezer” father of Matthan.
The same Jeshua and Eliezer of Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of “”Jeshua”” (Yeshua/ Jesus) the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, ““Eliezer””...
The dating of Eliezer in the genealogies of Matthew and Luke places him at the Second Temple, during the time of Ezra 10:18 of the priests who had married foreign wives.
Compare Joseph’s genealogies in Matt 1 and Luke 3, to Ezra 10:18 thru verse 44.
Joseph was a mamzer.
Deu 23:2,3 A mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of The Lord, even to the tenth generation (never), nor his offspring.
Hence, Joseph “Bitterly Hated” the Sanhedrin of Sadducees, Pharisees and teachers of the Law.
* Compare to ; “Hagar and Ishmael”.
2. Mary was a mamzer;
The name “Mary” (Miriam) originates from the sister of Aaron and Moses, hence implies Mary the mother of Jesus was a “Levite”.
In Judaism names follow lineages (Numbers 1:18, 36:7),
Nehemiah 12:10, “Jeshua* (Yeshua) was the father of Joachim (Joiakim).” Tanakh
* Same Jeshua (Yeshua) of Ezra 10:18.
Joachim, father of Mary, was a Levite.
Mary was a Levite name.
Yeshua (Jesus) was a Levite name.
Mary’s mother “Anna”, was a Levite name.
Mary’s uncle “Zacharias*, was a Levite name.
Mary’s aunt Elizabeth*”, was a Levite name.
* Luke 1:16,
The common thread of all of Mary’s relatives was;
Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of “Jeshua” (Yeshua/ Jesus) the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, “Eliezer”, Jarib and Gedaliah. Tanakh
Mary was a descendant of Yeshua, of the sons who had married foreign wives.
Mary was a mamzer.
Deu 23:2,3 A mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of The Lord, even to the tenth generation (never), nor his offspring.
Hence, Joseph, Mary and Jesus “Bitterly Hated” the Sanhedrin of Sadducees, Pharisees and teachers of the Law.
* Compare to ; “Hagar and Ishmael”.
3. Mamzers can only marry another mamzer;
Joseph and Mary were related through “”Eliezer*”” son of Jeshua (Yeshua).
Hence, Joseph would have been Mary’s nearest kinsman redeemer.
In Judaism names follow lineages (Numbers 1:18, 36:7);
Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of Jeshua (Yeshua/ Jesus)*** the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, Eliezer****, Jarib and Gedaliah.
Joseph;
Matt 1:15 “Eliezer” father of Matthan.
Luke 3:29 the son of Jeshua (Yeshua), the son of “Eliezer”...
Mary:
Nehemiah 12:10, “Jeshua* (Yeshua) was the father of Joachim (Joiakim).”
* The same Jeshua of Ezra 10:18
Joachim was Mary’s father.
Hence, Joseph was Mary’s kinsman redeemer.
4. Christians attempt to evade Ezra 10:18 by claiming Jesus’ Hebrew name was Joshua.
There are only two Joshua’s in the Jewish Tanakh (OT);
a. The original Joshua was the son of Nun of the tribe of “Ephraim.” Moses renames Hoshua; “Joshua”(Yhoshua, means Yah Delivers)”. Numbers 13:16 Tanakh
b. The other was Joshua the High Priest (a Levite).
In Ezra and Jewish genealogies, the first high priest of the second temple is “Yeshua”, but Haggai and Zakariah call the same high priest “Joshua” (Yhoshua, Yah Delivers). Haggai 1:1, 12, 2:14 and Zec 3:1, 6:11
“Jeshua = Joshua”,
Which still implies; Jesus was a mamzer of Ezra 10:18, by Joseph's lineages, and Mary’s father was Joachim, and her relatives were Levite descendants of Yeshua.
Neither Joshua’s were of Davidic lineage.
Jesus was not a descendant of King David.
B. Christians are from; “Mamzer women that interbreed with roman men”.
The origin of Christianity began in the 4th century BC, with the Hellenization of Israel. When some Jews began to assimilate into Greco Roman Culture and had forbidden relationships with the Romans.
* Research “Philo of Alexandria”, “Christian Hellenism”, and “Hellenistic Judaism”.
Roman or Jew? Lineages always follow the father
* Numbers 1:18, 36:7
1. Jesus was a roman;
Jesus had a mamzer mother, and a roman father.
“A Sorcerer Named Jesus*”, by Celsus (150 AD);
* which originated from the Jewish community.
...“The mother of Jesus was “convicted of adultery” and had been turned out by the carpenter who was betrothed to her.
Alone in the wilderness, Mary had the child by a certain soldier named “Panthera”.
Panthera is a Roman name.
* Research; “Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera”.
Roman or Jew? Lineages always follow the father.
* Numbers 1:18, 36:7
Jesus was a Roman.
All sects of Judaism teach; “Jesus was the bastard son of the roman soldier Panthera”.
2. Joseph had a mamzer mother, and a roman father.
Luke 3:23, “Joseph son of Heli*”.
“Heli or Hilios” is the personification of the sun in Greek mythology.
Roman or Jew? In Judaism lineages always follow the father.
Joseph was a Roman.
* The Hebrew letter “he” never precedes a name. Chrisitains implying Heli means “The Eli” makes no grammatical sense.
** There is no precedent as a word or a name in the Jewish Tanakh for “Heli”. If Heli was Hebrew, the correct Hebrew vowel points would be “Ha-Le”, as in “Ha-Le-Lu-Yah” Haleluyah. It is impossible in the Hebrew language for Heli to be Eli.
Furthermore, “Eli” was a Levite name, and names follow lineages (Numbers 1:18, 36:7). Eli would imply Joseph Mary and Jesus were Levites.
3. The twelve disciples had mamzer mothers, and roman fathers.
Matthew Alphaeus*
James Alphaeus*
Bartholomew*
Thomas*
Judas Thaddaeus*
Andrew*
Judas Iscariot*
Philip*
Simon Peter Cephus*, Hellenized as Cephus (Cyphus), John 1:42,
James** Zebedee*
John Zebedee**
Simon Cananean***
* are roman names
** “James” is a roman name. Implies James and John were Hellenists, greco romans.
*** Cananean, implies he was a Canaanite.
The disciples were Romans.
What united Jesus and his disciples was; “They were half breeds, between anglo roman fathers, and very dark skinned, dark eyed Jewish women”.
4. Paul had a mamzer mother and a roman father;
In Acts 22:28, Paul said; “But I was actually born a Roman”.
Roman or Jew? In Judaism lineages always follow the father.
If Paul’s father was a Roman, Paul was a Roman.
Saul (Paul) never mentions who his father is. Hence, he is called “Saul of Tarsus” to elude the schism of his roman father.
5. Hellenists;
A Hellenist had both a roman name and a Jewish name. Joseph's father is “Jacob” in Matthew 1, but his father is called “Heli” in Luke 3.
Jesus was the stepson of a Hellenist traitor.
Moreover, Jesus’ twelve disciples had Hellenists names.
Whether Jesus and his disciples were born romans, or were sons of Hellenists, or converted to Hellenism, they were still branded as “Hellenist traitors, roman conspirators”.
C. Joseph’s Fictitious Lineages;
First of all, Joseph was not the biological father of Jesus.
So the genealogies of Joseph in Matthew and Luke are useless in reference to Jesus being of the lineage of King David.
1. “Joseph” is not a Davidian name.
In Judaism names follow lineages (Numbers 1:18, 36:7);
“Joseph” was one of the twelve sons of Jacob, whose sons were Ephraim and Manasseh, who settled in central Israel.
Only a roman would make the rookie mistake of using names that crossed lineages.
2. Joseph’s “Proof of Jewishness”;
In the New Testament, there are two different supposive Davidic genealogies for Joseph. Luke has 55 generations from Abraham, but Matthew has 41 different generations from Abraham. Moreover, they are completely different lineages.
3. Christians claim the different lineages are because; “One of the lineages is Mary’s lineage”.
In Judaism, tribal status is always from the birth father’s lineage. (Numbers 1:18, 36:7);
Both lineages in Matt and Luke conclude with Joseph, hence they are both Joseph’s lineage.
a. Then, Mary’s father was Joachim a Levite. Not “Jacob” Matt 1:16, nor “Heli” in Luke 3:23
b. Furthermore, there is not a single example of a woman’s lineage in the Tanakh.
Women’s names are only mentioned when;
The wife was a convert as Ruth, hence she is ascribed onto her husband lineage.
Or when a father is sonless and only has daughters. The daughters must marry within the same tribe. Numbers 36:3-6
4. Compare the genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 to; 1 Chronicles 3
* Research; Kings of Israel List.
That, from Zerubbabel on, they are completely different lineages.
5. Matthew’s Genealogy of “Joseph of Nazareth”;
Matthew’s lineage of Joseph begins with a cut and paste of the Davidic lineage from the Tanakh (Jewish Bible) up to Zerubbabel.
* Compare the lineage in Matthew to; “Kings of Israel List”.
From Zerubbabel on (Matt 1:12), the genealogy is fictitious.
That Abihud (Abiud) was not a son of Zerubbabel.
Abihud (Abiub) is a Benjamite name.
From Abihud on, the lineage is a “Levite” lineage. Most notable in the lineage; “Zadok and Eliazer” are Levite names.
In Matt 1:15, “Eliezer” is a tarnished Levite name from;
Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of Jeshua* the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, “”Eliezer””**, Jarib and Gedaliah. JPS
This is a tarnished Levite lineage fictitiously attached to King David’s lineage.
Moreover, from Zerubbabel on, there is a lack of Judean and Davidian names.
5. Luke’s genealogy of Joseph;
Begins with a cut and paste of the Davidic lineage, from Adam up to King David.
Luke 3:31 son of Nathan… to; Luke 3:27 son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel.
Stop, the lineage is fictitious.
Zerubbabel is a descendant of Solomon, not a descendant of Nathan.
And the Davidic covenant is with Solomon, not Nathan. 1 Chronicles 22:9
Problem 2, Most of the names in Luke, from Nathan to Shealtiel and Zerubbabel, are Levite names.
Then, from Zerubbabel to Jesus, are Levite names again. That; “Joanan was not a son of Zerubbabel.
“Joanan” was the son of Joiahda, of the lineage of the High Priests of Israel.
Most notable; Mattathias, Nathan, Levi, Mattathias, and Melki are “Levite names”.
* Compare Luke 3, to; 1 Chronicles 3; “Kings of Israel List” and Matthew
This is a tarnished Levite lineage fictitiously attached to King David’s lineage.
Moreover, from Zerubbabel on, there is a lack of Judean and Davidian names.
a. Luke 3:29 “son of Eliazer”, ties Joseph and Jesus to Yeshua, son of Jozadak;
Ezra 10:18 Among the sons of the priests who had married foreign wives were found of the sons of Jeshua (Yeshua/ Jesus)* the son of Jozadak, and his brothers: Maaseiah, Eliazer, Jarib and Gedaliah.
6. John the Baptist;
In 37 BC, King Herod was a Hellenist who overthrew the Hasmonean Dynasty.
Then he handpicked other Hellenists to be pseudo High Priests of Israel.
King Herod’s puppet priests were “not Zadokim'' (sons of Zadok whose allegiance was to King David). Therefore, they were rejected by Mainline Jews (Pharisees, Sadducees and Teachers of the law).
John the Baptist’s father Zecharias was one of the Herodian Hellenist puppet priests.
How do we know this?
Luke 1:8 Zechariah was on duty and he was serving as priest before God.
Implicating Zechariah as a Herodian Hellenist puppet priest.
a. Zechariah was not a Zadokim (a son of Zadok whose allegiance was to King David), Luke 1:5
Research; “List of High Priests of Israel”, search for “Zechariah” and his father “Abijah” Luke 1:5.
And note, Zechariah and Abijah were not descendants of Zadok (whose allegiance was to King David).
Hence, John the Baptist was not qualified to anoint Jesus “King of the Jews”.
D. The Bible Codec of Bethlehem;
King David was a Judean, a descendant of Judah.
And the area allocated to Judah was “Southern Israel”. Judeans were born and lived in Judah, in southern Israel.
King David was “born and raised in Bethlehem in Judea, in southern Israel”.
Henceforth, all the Davidic Kings of Israel were born, and “lived in Judah”, in southern Israel.
Of all the tribes of Israel, the descendants of the Davidic kings were the most devoted to Judea. And it is inconceivable to believe that someone from the lineage of a Davidic king would be living anywhere else except in Judea.
1. In Judaism inheritance follows lineages for the allotment of land. Numbers 1:18, 36:7 Tanakh
If Joseph and Mary were Davidic, they would have been born and would have lived their entire life in Judea, in southern Israel.
They did not live in Judea because; “they had no inheritance in Judah or southern Israel”.
John 7:1, After these things Jesus walked in Galilee, for He did not want to walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him.
Because, Jesus had a “Levite name” and claimed to be a Son of David, a Judean.
The real Davidians and Judeans exposed Jesus’ Davidic claim as a case of “Stolen Valor”, an impostor.
2. If Jesus and his disciples were romans. Why did the romans oppose them? We have to go back to the beginning;
Chrisianity opens with King Herod discovering that a rival king was born. Then John the Baptist anoints Jesus as a rival “King of the Jews”.
John Baptist, Jesus and his disciples were executed for their rebellions against the Herodians.
Moreover, Jesus fictitiously claimed to be a son of king David.
Therefore, Jesus’ Official Charge was nailed to his cross,
“Falsely claiming to be
King of the Jews”.
2. The Bible Codec of Nazareth;
One becomes a Nazarite when their parents make a vow to YHVH, and they give their firstborn to the Levite priests.
* Research “Nazarites”, Numbers 6:1, Judges 13, Samuel (Judges 13) and Samson (1 Samuel 13:11). Tanakh
Nazarites were trained and resided with the Levite priests “East of The Temple in Jerusalem”.
Being a Nazarite was a priesthood, not a place.
There was no such place called “Nazarite or Nazareth”, in the Tanakh.
The place where Joseph, Mary and Jesus, was living was originally called “Mamzereth” (Mamzerut), a refuge city of adulterers.
* Research; “Mamzereth” and “Mamzeruth”.
And Christians cunningly changed Mamzereth to; “Nazareth”.
Hence, John 1:46 was originally;
“Jews replied; Can anything good come out of ‘'Mamzereth” (a city of adultery)?
A “mamzer” was a child conceived from an adulterous relationship.
Thus, the Pharisees, Sadducees and Teachers of the Law, kept questioning “Jesus of Mamzereth” on the subject of “adultery”, of which Jesus attempted to evade the questions. Matt 22:23, MK 12:18, LK 20:27, Titus 3:9, 1 Tim 1:4
3. The “Original Christmas Story*”;
* which originated from the Jewish community.
“A Sorcerer Named Jesus”, by Celsus (170 AD);
"...he [Jesus] came from a Jewish village and from a poor country woman who earned her living by spinning. She was convicted of adultery and was driven out by her husband, who was a carpenter by trade.
After she had been driven out by her husband and while she was wandering about
in a disgraceful way, she secretly gave birth to Jesus.
Because he [Jesus] was poor he hired himself out as a workman in Egypt*, and there tried his hand at certain magical powers on which the Egyptians* pride themselves; he returned full of conceit, because of these powers, and on account of them gave himself the title of God...
* Also Research “Jesus the Egyptian, by Lena Einhorn”
The mother of Jesus had been convicted of adultery and had been turned out by the carpenter who was betrothed to her.
Alone in the wilderness, Mary had the child by a certain soldier named “Panthera”.
All sects of Judaism teaches; “Mary the mother of Jesus was a harlot, and Jesus was the bastard son of a Roman soldier”.
Research on Jewish websites; “Bible Codec”, “Why Jews don’t believe in Jesus”, “Yeshu ben Panthera”, “Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera”, “Jesus in the Talmud”, “Judaism view of Jesus”, “Yeshu in the Tosefa”, “Yeshu HaNatzri”, “Toledot Yeshu”, and “Ben Stada”
4. Roman Legends intertwined into Judaism;
Jewish men rejected mamzer women as Mary.
And roman men used them for sport and entertainment (as harlots), and when they got pregnant, the romans threw them and her children out onto the streets.
A girl in trouble can tell colorful stories when living in Israel, where she would be stoned to death for an illegitimate pregnancy. It was too common for Jewish girls to be seduced by married roman men, then conceive illegitimate children.
By the first century, Rome had long occupied Israel and their myths became well known, as with the Roman myth of the virgin goddess; “Rhea Silvia” (mother of Rome, mother of god).
Rhea Silvia was of royal lineage, yet conceived twin illegitimate sons, and when her brother-in-law King inquired of her, she said “””god did it”””. Her sons Remus and Romulus, became Kings of Rome.
So what does a girl in trouble do? Lie like hell and claim “god did it”. Appealing to roman laws.
As with Rhea Silvia and Romulus (King of the Romen Empire).
The romans took a harlot and attempted to make their bastard son; “King of the Jews.”
* Research; “Great Mothers of the gods”, “Rhea Silvia”, Maia, Ops, Tellus, and Ceres.
E. Chapter Summary;
What united Jesus, his disciples and Paul is; “They had roman fathers who abandoned them.
by Ken Marlin
scicologist@gmail.com